A New Internet Protocol to Combat the “Virus” of Corporate Interests
The current state of the internet is “necrotic” and “sad,” with a lack of genuine, good-faith discourse due to the influence of corporate interests and AI-generated content. This mirrors what happened to the early days of the web, where open forums and mailing lists were eventually overrun by spam and commercialization. The proposed solution is to create a new internet protocol that is not interoperable with the existing TCP/IP, DNS, and HTTP/HTML infrastructure, making it as distinct as a new language.
This new protocol would require a higher barrier to entry, adding friction to prevent low-effort contributions and spam. The incentive structure would need to be shifted from engagement metrics to altruistic values, such as honoring the commons. This would likely result in a smaller network, catering to a specific type of user who values community and thoughtfulness over monetary gain or popularity.
Historically, the internet has struggled with maintaining a decentralized public commons, with platforms like Reddit and Twitter being overrun by corporate interests and AI-generated content. The proposed solution draws inspiration from collaborative projects like the Talmud, Buddhist sutras, and Wikipedia, which have maintained a level of integrity and good-faith engagement despite their imperfections.
The Decision Logic Behind Creating a New Internet Protocol
The driving force behind this proposal is the recognition that the existing internet infrastructure is fundamentally flawed, allowing corporate interests to exploit and pollute the online discourse. By creating a new protocol, the goal is to establish a digital arena where good-faith engagement is the norm, rather than the exception. This would require a significant investment in developing new infrastructure, including a distinct backend and parsing mechanism.
The operational mechanics of this new protocol would involve a higher barrier to entry, making it more difficult for users to access and contribute to the network. This would likely involve technical hurdles, such as a distinct language or protocol, that would discourage low-effort contributions and spam. The incentive structure would need to be redesigned to prioritize altruistic values, such as honoring the commons, over engagement metrics or monetary gain.
The decision-making logic behind this proposal is centered around the idea that the existing internet infrastructure is beyond repair, and that a new approach is needed to establish a genuine, good-faith online discourse. This requires a willingness to abandon the existing infrastructure and start anew, rather than trying to patch up the existing system.
Winners and Losers in the New Internet Protocol Landscape
The winners in this new landscape would be users who value community and thoughtfulness over monetary gain or popularity. These users would be willing to invest time and effort into contributing to the network, and would be rewarded with a higher level of engagement and discourse. The losers would be corporate interests that rely on exploiting the existing internet infrastructure for profit, as well as users who prioritize short-term gains over long-term value.
The impact of this new protocol would be felt across various industries, including advertising, media, and technology. Companies that rely on exploiting user data and attention would need to adapt to a new paradigm, where users are in control of their own data and attention. This could lead to a shift in the business model of many companies, from advertising-driven to subscription-based or community-supported.
The adjacent markets that would be affected by this new protocol include the development of new technologies, such as decentralized identity management and secure communication protocols. These technologies would be necessary to support the new protocol and ensure that users have control over their own data and attention.
The Skeptical Case: Can a New Internet Protocol Really Solve the Problem?
One of the strongest arguments against the proposal is that it is overly idealistic and ignores the fundamental nature of human behavior. The assumption that users will prioritize altruistic values over engagement metrics or monetary gain is unproven, and it is possible that the new protocol would simply replicate the existing problems. Additionally, the technical challenges of developing a new protocol and infrastructure are significant, and it is unclear whether the benefits would outweigh the costs.
A historical analogue that supports this skeptical view is the failure of previous attempts to create decentralized, community-driven platforms, such as Diaspora and OpenSocial. These platforms failed to gain traction and were eventually abandoned, highlighting the difficulty of creating a sustainable, decentralized online community.
The Signal to Watch Next: Will the New Internet Protocol Gain Traction?
The next signal to watch is whether the new internet protocol will gain traction and attract a significant number of users. This will depend on the success of the development process, the effectiveness of the new infrastructure, and the willingness of users to adapt to a new paradigm. A key indicator of success will be the growth rate of the user base and the level of engagement and discourse on the platform.
A specific event to watch is the release of the new protocol and infrastructure, which is expected to happen within the next 12-18 months. This will provide a clear indication of whether the project is on track to deliver a viable alternative to the existing internet infrastructure.
What’s your take on this? Drop your perspective in the comments below.
By Alex Mercer, Senior Tech Analyst at TrendFlashy
Ready to launch your own asset?
Check out our guide on Building a Profitable Online Business.
