Medicare’s AI-Driven Payment Model Disrupts Healthcare
Medicare’s new payment model, ACCESS, is poised to revolutionize the healthcare industry by rewarding health outcomes rather than required activities. This marks a significant shift from traditional Medicare reimbursement structures, which have long prioritized time spent with clinicians over actual patient outcomes.
This change has far-reaching implications, particularly for companies like Pair Team, which has been building towards this moment for over five years. Pair Team’s CEO, Neil Batlivala, notes that the payment structure is the real news, as it creates a mechanism for reimbursing AI-driven medical care for the first time.
This mirrors the shift in the insurance industry, where companies like Lemonade have disrupted traditional underwriting models with AI-driven risk assessment. Similarly, ACCESS’s focus on outcome-based payments is likely to upend the traditional healthcare model, where clinicians are paid for services rendered rather than results achieved.
Pair Team’s AI-Driven Care Model
Pair Team’s care model is built around a voice AI agent called Flora, which serves as the primary patient-facing interface. Flora handles intake, coordinates referrals, and conducts check-ins between clinical visits, freeing up human clinicians to focus on high-touch care.
The company’s model has peer-reviewed evidence behind it, with a study published in the Journal of General Internal Medicine showing strong patient engagement and significant reductions in avoidable emergency and inpatient utilization. However, delivering this level of care has historically required human teams, limiting scalability and cost-effectiveness.
Flora’s deployment has changed this, allowing Pair Team to scale its care model more quickly and cheaply. The company now employs roughly 850 clinical professionals and generates revenue above nine figures, with partnerships in place that give it access to roughly 500,000 potential patients.
Winners and Losers in the New Payment Model
Companies like Pair Team, which have invested heavily in AI-driven care models, are well-positioned to benefit from ACCESS. Other winners include virtual nutrition therapy providers, connected device companies, and wearable makers like Whoop, which are also participating in the program.
However, not all participants are created equal. Batlivala is skeptical of some of the other companies in the program, noting that wearables may not be effective for seniors struggling with food insecurity. Losers in this new payment model may include traditional healthcare providers that are slow to adopt AI-driven care models or lack the necessary infrastructure to participate in ACCESS.
The impact of ACCESS will also be felt in adjacent markets, such as medical device manufacturing and pharmaceuticals. Companies that can demonstrate the effectiveness of their products in improving health outcomes may see increased demand and reimbursement rates.
The Skeptical Case
One of the strongest arguments against ACCESS is that it may not be effective in improving health outcomes for all patients. The program’s focus on outcome-based payments may create perverse incentives for providers to cherry-pick healthier patients or avoid those with complex needs.
This concern is not unfounded, as previous CMS innovation programs have had mixed results. A 2023 Congressional Budget Office analysis found that the CMS Innovation Center increased federal spending by $5.4 billion during its first decade rather than producing the projected savings.
Signal to Watch Next
The next verifiable event to watch will be the release of CMS’s evaluation of the first year of the ACCESS program. This will provide insight into the program’s effectiveness in improving health outcomes and reducing costs, as well as its impact on participating providers and patients.
Pair Team’s ability to scale its care model and reach a million patients within three years will also be a key indicator of the program’s success. If the company is able to demonstrate significant improvements in health outcomes and cost savings, it may become a model for other providers to follow.
What’s your take on this? Drop your perspective in the comments below.
By Alex Mercer, Senior Tech Analyst at TrendFlashy
Ready to launch your own asset?
Check out our guide on Building a Profitable Online Business.
