Gigascale’s $250M Climate Fund: Betting Against the Tide
The venture firm led by former Meta CTO Mike Schroepfer has raised a $250 million fund to back founders who are “rebuilding the physical economy” through climate tech. This move bucks conventional wisdom, which has soured on the “climate tech” thesis. By continuing with the overt climate focus, Gigascale is zigging when most are zagging.
This mirrors the contrarian approach taken by Sequoia Capital in 2010, when they invested heavily in clean tech despite the sector’s struggles. Sequoia’s bets ultimately paid off, with companies like Tesla and Sunrun emerging as industry leaders. Gigascale’s second fund is shaping up to be a continuation of the sort of bets that Schroep has made in the three years since he started Gigascale.
The firm has backed some high-profile startups in the climate tech space, including Commonwealth Fusion Systems, Heron Power, Mill, and Form Energy. Gigascale emerged from Schroep’s study of climate tech during COVID, and the new fund is the first with an early-stage focus that includes institutional investors.
Gigascale’s Investment Thesis: Energy and Infrastructure
Climate tech has always been a wide-ranging sector, and Gigascale’s portfolio reflects that. But in recent years, the sector has become increasingly focused on energy and infrastructure, a shift that has been largely driven by the demands of AI. It’s no surprise, then, that power is a significant focus of the new fund.
With rising demand for electricity, there’s an opportunity to invest in new energy sources and new ways to deliver that to businesses and households. Schroepfer pointed to solar as a recent example of a clean technology that’s faster and cheaper and winning the market. While solar and batteries have come to dominate conversations around clean power, Schroepfer clearly sees more opportunities.
AI and broader trends in electrification have made it challenging for companies to connect to the grid. In response, many have been seeking to develop their own power sources, though there, too, competition is stiff. Natural gas turbines, for example, have a waitlist that stretches into the early 2030s. The power crunch gives energy startups an opening.
Winners and Losers: Who Benefits from Gigascale’s Bet
Startups that can supply power cheaper or more flexibly — or both — can win on those merits alone. But Gigascale also expects its energy investments to extend beyond generation, citing grid infrastructure, critical minerals, and physical AI as other places where the company will look for opportunities.
The companies that Gigascale backs will likely benefit from the growing demand for clean energy and the increasing focus on energy infrastructure. However, established players in the energy sector may see Gigascale’s investments as a threat to their business models. The shift towards clean energy and decentralized power generation could disrupt the traditional energy industry.
The downstream effect of Gigascale’s investments could also impact industries that rely heavily on energy, such as manufacturing and transportation. Companies that can adapt to the changing energy landscape and invest in clean energy solutions may emerge as winners, while those that fail to adapt may struggle to remain competitive.
The Skeptical Case: What Could Go Wrong
One potential risk for Gigascale’s investments is the high cost of developing and deploying clean energy technologies. While the cost of solar and wind energy has decreased significantly in recent years, the cost of other clean energy technologies, such as hydrogen fuel cells, remains high.
Another potential risk is the uncertainty surrounding government policies and regulations related to clean energy. Changes in government policies or regulations could impact the demand for clean energy technologies and the viability of Gigascale’s investments. The failure of companies like Solyndra in 2011 serves as a reminder of the risks involved in investing in clean energy technologies.
What to Watch Next: The Signal to Confirm or Disprove the Thesis
The next verifiable event that will confirm or disprove the thesis of this article is the performance of Gigascale’s portfolio companies in the next 12-18 months. If these companies are able to demonstrate significant growth and traction in the market, it will validate Gigascale’s investment thesis and potentially lead to increased investment in the clean energy sector.
Another signal to watch is the progress of government policies and regulations related to clean energy. If governments continue to implement policies that support the development and deployment of clean energy technologies, it will create a favorable environment for Gigascale’s investments to succeed.
What’s your take on this? Drop your perspective in the comments below.
By Alex Mercer, Senior Tech Analyst at TrendFlashy
Ready to launch your own asset?
Check out our guide on Building a Profitable Online Business.
